EFFECT OF ADHOCRACY CULTURE AND MANAGEMENT INFLUENCE ON LOGISTICS EFFECTIVENESS IN A CONSUMER GOODS FIRMS IN OSHODI-ISOLO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, LAGOS NIGERIA

Authors

  • Oluwaseun Ogundipe Redeemer's University

Keywords:

adhocracy culture, distribution frequency, operational costs, on-time delivery, customer satisfaction

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of adhocracy culture and top management influence on logistics performance among consumer goods firms in Oshodi-Isolo Local Government Area, Lagos, Nigeria. The study used a quantitative methodology, with a Pearson Correlation Matrix to examine the connections between adhocracy culture and logistical effectiveness metrics, and a hierarchical multiple regression analysis to investigate the combined impacts of the adhocracy culture and top management influence on on-time delivery performance. The results show positive relationships between adhocracy cultural characteristics and logistics effectiveness variables, such as distribution frequency, operational costs, on-time delivery, and customer satisfaction. These relationships are noted explicitly as essential elements influencing employees' commitment, innovative values, organizational adaptation, flexibility, leadership impact, and workability. The study also emphasizes the significance of socioeconomic traits in affecting on-time delivery performance, including gender, age, educational level, and years of experience. The model's predictive ability for on-time delivery is greatly improved by including these variables and the features relevant to the adhocracy culture. The study highlights the importance of fostering a healthy adhocracy culture inside firms to enhance performance outcomes across several areas, including logistics efficiency and delivery punctuality. The results highlight the significance of considering socioeconomic factors in addition to the adhocracy ethos, offering helpful information for companies looking to improve delivery performance and streamline logistical operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acar, S. (2019). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: An empirical investigation in the context of Turkish banks. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 10(2), 1–18.

Adesina, S. O. (2003). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(5), 433-443.

Adim, O. O., Eke, A. O., & Igbokwe, C. C. (2018). The role of knowledge sharing on organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 9(4), 1-18.

Alagaraja, M., & Aryee, S. (2014). The impact of adhocracy culture on employee work outcomes: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Business.

Ateke, C. O., & Didia, C. O. (2017). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(2), 1-18.

Bhatnagar, S., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2014). Supply chain integration and firm performance: Moderating role of trust. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 267-274.

Cai, G., Droge, C., & Zhang, J. (2009). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 17–33.

Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2016). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chand, R., & Gupta, V. (2022). The impact of adhocracy culture on work ability: The mediating role of leadership influence. Journal of Business Research, 138, 102466.

Cheng, S. H., & Hsu, C. H. (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 27-38.

Cheng, S. H., & Hsu, C. H. (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 27-38.

Chowdhury, M. R., & Quaddus, M. A. (2017). The impact of artificial intelligence on the future of work: A systematic review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 1–18.

Deshpande, S. S., & Farley, J. U. (2019). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Indian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 10(1), 1–18.

Didia, C. O. (2017). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 1–18.

Dikmen, I. (2017). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Turkish banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(3), 1–18.

Duodu, A. B., & Amankwah, K. (2011). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(11), 953-971.

Ghoneim, M. A. (2019). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Egyptian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 1-18.

Gupta, V., & Chand, R. (2021). The relationship between adhocracy culture and workability: The moderating role of leadership influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(1), 115–133.

Huang, H. C., & Lin, C. H. (2021). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing sector. Journal of Business Research, 126, 181-188.

Jigjiddorj, B., Choi, T. Y., & Kim, Y. (2020). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from Mongolia. Journal of Business Research, 118, 1089– 1096.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

Kalubanga, A., Awasthi, A., & Shankar, R. (2012). Supply chain integration and firm performance: A study of Indian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 136-145.

Kamalahmadi, M., Niknafs, A., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2016). The relationship between organizational learning and intellectual capital: A study of knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 261-279.

Kim, Y., Shin, J., & Chung, J. (2011). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: The mediating effect of operational flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 164-173.

Kuo, Y. H., Cheng, S. H., & Chiang, C. Y. (2020). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(1), 45-55.

Mason, M. (2018). The future of work in a world of automation. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 41–52.

Maxwell, J. O., & Chukwudi, O. U. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 9(1), 1–18.

Mehta, S., Jha, S., & Shankar, R. (2000). Supply chain integration and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 18(1), 73–87.

Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W. D., Keebler, C. R., Min, S., Smith, J. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001).

Miska, M., & Didia, C. O. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 9(2), 1-18.

Morgan, S. G., Lee, S. M., & Whitley, R. (2009). Knowledge sharing in the global innovation network: A study of multinational R&D teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 481–499.

Newstron, C. (2011). Supply chain integration and performance: A literature review. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 17–30.

Noe, R. A., Clarke, S., & Ford, J. K. (2017). Learning in organizations (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Nongo, C., & Ikyanyon, E. (2012). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Cameroon. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(14), 9-18.

Nongo, C., & Ikyanyon, E. (2012). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Cameroon. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(14), 9-18.

Oginni, A. A., & Adesanya, O. O. (2013). The impact of organizational culture on knowledge sharing in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4(4), 1-17.

Ogunrin, O., & Inegbenebor, J. I. (2015). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Nigeria. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 142-147.

Ogunro, O. A. (2014). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance in the Nigerian banking industry. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 1–18.

Ojo, A. O. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25.

Oko, E. (2013). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Nigeria. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 119–125.

Omukaga, W. (2016). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Kenya. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3770– 3776.

Paddeu, L. (2016). Supply chain integration and performance: A meta-analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), 20–36.

Rai, A., & Gupta, V. (2020). The impact of adhocracy culture on work ability: A cross-level study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 782–796.

Rastegar, A., & Aghayan, A. (2012). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Iran. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 2089-2095.

Samli, A. C., Souitaris, V., & Tallon, P. (2005). The impact of knowledge management practices on supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 1-28.

Skyttner, L. (2017). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Suleiman, A. A., & Radwan, M. O. (2017). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector of Egypt. Journal of Business Research, 70(10), 4127-4133.

Veljkovic, M., Stanujkic, D., & Gligoric, M. (2015). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: A meta-analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 44(1), 155-166.

Vinhas, J., & Gibbs, P. (2012). Supply chain integration and firm performance: A literature review and empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 146-156.

Wang, G., & Howell, J. M. (2013). Organizational learning: A review and synthesis of literature. Journal of Management, 39(3), 723–756.

Wei, J., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: A study of Chinese manufacturing firms. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 39–48.

Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, K. (2017). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 118–136.

Zhang, J., & Swink, M. (2017). The impact of socioeconomic characteristics on logistics effectiveness: Evidence from emerging and developed economies. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 1-15.

Zhang, J., & Zhu, J. (2017). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: A study of Chinese manufacturing firms. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(1), 45–54.

Zhang, X., Jia, S., & Chen, X. (2017). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(1), 45–54.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Ogundipe, O. (2025) “EFFECT OF ADHOCRACY CULTURE AND MANAGEMENT INFLUENCE ON LOGISTICS EFFECTIVENESS IN A CONSUMER GOODS FIRMS IN OSHODI-ISOLO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, LAGOS NIGERIA”, Journal of Management Sciences and Applications, 4(1), pp. 104–120. Available at: https://jomsa.science/index.php/jomsa/article/view/107 (Accessed: 9 July 2025).

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Management Sciences and Applications (JOMSA)

Section

Articles

License

JOMSA maintains CC Attribution 4.0 license and authors retain the copyright.